Fader instead of trim

Post questions or comments about the A12 here.

Fader instead of trim

Postby ElektricEye » Sun May 10, 2009 9:44 pm

Is there a way that I can convert the fader into a trim pot, such as the n72 and T15? I'd like to see if I can push those transformers a little harder for some nice harmonic distortion. However, if it's not advisable please say so!
ElektricEye
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:57 pm

Postby tpryan » Mon May 11, 2009 5:50 am

Is there a way that I can convert the fader into a trim pot, such as the n72 and T15?


Nope. You might try a passive attenuator on the output such as the A Designs "ATTY".
tpryan
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2078
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 11:32 pm

Postby donks » Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:50 pm

tpryan \$m[1]:
Is there a way that I can convert the fader into a trim pot, such as the n72 and T15?


Nope. You might try a passive attenuator on the output such as the A Designs "ATTY".


The ATTY looks suspiciously like 2x male and 2x female xlr jacks and a dual-gang audio taper 100k pot. Is there more to this or is this something we could make ourselves? Thanks for any help you can offer.
donks
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:45 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Postby tpryan » Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:50 pm

A 100K pot would work in many situations, but I hope it's an adjustable pad that maintains constant input and output impedance. If the input impedance of the final load is high (10K or more, say) compared to the output impedance of the preamp, a 10K pot would work.
tpryan
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2078
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 11:32 pm

Postby donks » Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:13 pm

tpryan \$m[1]:A 100K pot would work in many situations, but I hope it's an adjustable pad that maintains constant input and output impedance. If the input impedance of the final load is high (10K or more, say) compared to the output impedance of the preamp, a 10K pot would work.

Thank you for the impedance hint. For anyone who comes across this thread, I found what looks like a good solution here:
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/283395-post10.html
donks
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:45 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Postby pleasantbullet » Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:02 pm

why not run the output of the A12 to the T15, then fade accordingly with the T15?
pleasantbullet
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:10 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Postby Randyman... » Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:18 pm

pleasantbullet \$m[1]:why not run the output of the A12 to the T15, then fade accordingly with the T15?


Because then you'd be driving +28dBu or so into the T15's Mic Input - This would obliterate the signal well before reaching the T15's output attenuator ;)

I have some spare 600 Ohm Balanced Input Attenuators (spares from my mnats/hairball 1176 builds) that I plan on wiring up as patchable variable pads in addition to the -6dB and -12dB inline XLR pads I already use for this application.

Driving the A12's outputs (and transformers) hard for Rock Drums is a must IMO - and that just ain't gonna happen into most AD's on the planet w/o a pad on the A12's outputs.

:cool:
Just trying to get by...
Randy V.
8x A12; 4x N72; 2x J99; 2x C84
Randyman...
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: Houston, TX


Return to A12

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

cron